Bareback Writing

I know it’s been a year and a month since my last confession–I mean, blog post. But I found this old scrap of mine tucked in a notebook. And it seemed to suggest a beckoning, if not a reckoning. So I thought I’d use it as a kind of stalking horse and see where it took me. I do have some potential stablemates ready to keep it company, maybe. But one canter for Leibowitz at a time….

Bareback Writing

So, jump on. No saddle, just straddle the withers and away we go, like a trick rider, standing up, flipping over to one side or another, while the mount canters around the ring and then, at full gallop, charges out of the circus tent like the show horse in the movie,The Electric Horseman, with his rider, Robert Redford deciding enough was enough, this animal needs to be free, so he propels it along random streets in this dusty Western town, pursued by police cars until finally he breaks out of the grid into the open prairie outside of town and outdistances his pursuers.
Well, sometimes it works that way. And sometimes the horse ambles into the nearest clump of tall grass in the roadside, like a horse I remember named Tennessee that I tried to “steer,” yanking ineffectually on its bridle while it ignored the nuisance on its back. Metaphors do not come with a guarantee of performance. The idea is to jump on and see where the words take you—out into the starry night, up into the weeds — c’mon, horsey, giddy-up, horsey—or often, nowhere. At 3:00, the rental hour is up. The wrangler wipes down the horse, who hasn’t broken a sweat, and asks, “How was it?”

Magical. Exhilarating. We were one animal. The wind in his mane, the wind in my hair; Next time we’ll go full Pegasus.I mime Buddy Hollly on percussion: “Pega sus, Pega sus… Pretty, pretty, pretty, pretty Pega sus….”  

Ask a Writer

Lately I’ve been pondering my brain as a possible staging area for a variety of special effects ranging from low-watt headaches to the audial illusion of cicadas shrilling outside (in January?), to this rumored substance that’s said to gum up the neural networks, that is variously referred to as plaque, amyloids, and alpha synucleins, and is suspected of causing or abetting Parkinson’s, Alzheimer’s, Lewy Body dementia, diminishing executive function. the squandering of time, and (why not throw the book at it?) the whole erosive process of aging.

Arrayed against this crew of sludgehammers is a wannabe hero, age 73, with a waning reserve of energy and a quixotic plan relying on luck, faith, and magical thinking. That Igorish commando is me, the Writer, picking my way through a minefield of words and ideas, while brandishing my color-coded graph-ruled notebooks and wondering alternately, Am I saying anything useful? and What if writing is all I’ve got?  Outrageous! Alarming! Courageous! Charming! —to borrow Randy Newman’s lyric from “Simon Smith and His Amazing Dancing Bear” Yes, I brandish and borrow like a Brando contender, showing off, getting distracted from writing  in preference for listening to Randy Newman’s song, which pulls me deeper into youTube plaque (Steve Martin’s “King Tut,” Brian Wilson, the Beatles, Linda Ronstadt, etc). Then maybe I’ll stumble onto something like “sludgehammers” and all is well.

 Pay attention to the humbug behind the curtain. It’s me, posing as a brain expert who’s posing as a warrior who’s looking for a conduit to explain just how writing works. (Wait. You don’t know?) (Let’s just say it’s elusive. I figured creativity starts with the brain, so I thought l’d borrow and brandish a little neuro-authority and throw around the amyloid reference for cover.) (I think this is not exactly filling me with confidence in your credentials, bro.) (Stick with me, parenthetical pal. I need an ally).  (But do you? The title of this piece,“Ask a writer” You wrote that, I assume? ) (Yes.) (And therefore the writer you are referring to must surely be you! So ask yourselfI what’s the big mystery about writing? As you suggested earlier , writing is words expressing ideas, no more, no less.) (I guess so.Maybe it’s a Parkinsonian thing. Fear of falling. I need to feel safe. In fact, I was going to ask you, other self: can we share the same pair of parentheses? Seeing how we have the same parent, he sez. See what I did there? Parent-he-sez? —Yeah. clever. Here’s another one.”If you flaunt it, make sure you’ve got it.” Usually it’s the other way around. But seriously, don’t worry about losing the knack.Assume you’re capable. Assuming is a writer’s power. You can even assume you’re not alone, that writing is the craft of a crew of carpenters. In fact, there was an old TV show in the 1960s called “I’m Dickens, He’s Fenster,” about a pair of carpenters, played by John Astin and Marty Ingels. Of course, the true craft on display wasn’t carpentry, but writing. And the title of that show could have been, “I’m Ideas, He’s Words.”” Close parentheses!)

Idears and Words

Fraught with peril but as enticing as high tea with scones, butter cakes, and cookies,. And three kinds of tea, all favorites—assam, oolong, lapsang-souchong…. I know, I probably overdid that high tea metaphor. But hey, give me credit for canceling the cream pies. Words can get you into trouble, no doubt. But they’re also undoubtedly toothsome and habit-forming. (Who uses toothsome anymore? And why cookies and not biscuits?) Don’t get stuck in word plaque, Fenster! Naw, words know the joy I take in their infinite multiplicity.Or variety. Or verbosity. Even if I‘m constantly overruling myself about my choices. Words matter. WORDS ARE FUN. (Cap lock error, but stet it) And words are a puzzle-setter’s holiday compared to the serious decisions, the big-time adult-table choosing of ideas (until words start to edit them to smithereens) But let me not imply, or invite an inference, that Dickens and Fenster—or Ideas and Words—are on opposite sides in a writers’ civil war. Not so. Aren’t they playing nice now? Just please don’t bring up the Question. 

Okay, fine, let’s assume there’s an amnesty. Go for it. The Question, asked of writers through ignorance and innocence since Hector was a pupil, is: WHERE DO YOU GET YOUR IDEAS? Not even “How do you get your ideas?” which would make more sense. But “Where…?” as if ideas regularly crawl in from interesting, arcane, recondite sources, such as a magical gargoyle, a giggling maiden, a gifted mynah bird, a gift horse mind reader, and Celeste goes on, It’s odd that no one ever seems to ask a writer, “How do you choose your words?” Am I the only one who finds that strange? asks Fenster. Not to compete with my grown-up table colleague or anything. 

Naw,a writer needs both ideas and words in healthy rapport as well as healthy friction, and usually that collaboration starts with an idea: a staging area inspired by the brain, planned from seeds and sparks, and built with words. But a word can spark an idea. Or the sparks arc back and forth from Dickens to Fenster and Fenster to Dickens.

“Write Anyway”

Here’s an idea I had recently. Write anyway. Despite the outrageous & alarming slings and arrows I hurl obstacularly in my way, Despite the hisses and boos disguised as ideas but are actually Mr. Hyd/eas, as in Dr. Jekyll’s hidden foil. (BOTCHED THAT ONE! sneers Hyde, Or it could also be “Write any way.” Which grants you permission to write in any manner or mode, such as that dialogue between the two parenthetical voices to cut the cleverness with a little wisdom. Or sprinkle in obscure cultural references like “I’m Dickens, He’s Fenster” and justify it by using them as metaphors for Words and Ideas.(Actually, I thought that was pretty resourceful.) But allowing oneself the liberty of a particular writing style is more like a Word choice. Whereas “Write anyway” is an idea with broad, even universal, application.Designed to combat obstructive thinking. It would make a good wall motto. Or a plaque—the good wooden kind: WRITE ANYWAY! Dickens, you’re hired.

Next: A word can be an idea? Granted. 

Outside In

A while ago I received a message from a dream. In it, I was reviewing a word actIvity for kids. The words were listed in a magazine with colorful illustrations. In real life I was no stranger to vocabulary worksheets, having labored for years as an editor in a school publishing company. It was a kind of nostalgic joke to be doing it now in a dream, but I took it seriously.  I even took issue with one word in particular: outside.  It seemed to me, in my dream opinion, that outside was “too easy for kids.” I kept thinking about that assessment after I woke up. What did too easy mean? Was I dumbing down the complex, intricate relationship I had built with the outside world? I used to view nature as a private realm to write about, whose detailed mysteries I should explore, like what crows conversed about. And what plants could teach us about growing up.

But my ambit changed as my energy level changed, or seemed to. No longer did I choose to go out meadowing in suburban hayfields or keep a nature journal, recording the presence of woodcocks, woolly bear caterpillars, the private autumn of crickets, early frost, and purple asters. Instead that realm of details went back to  the park of exile it used to claim when my mom ordered me to go outside and get some fresh air. Only when that decision to explore became my own, building on a gradual discovery of backyard birds and leaves, did I sense the banishment becoming acceptance and finally, choice. Which co-existed for a long time with the inside world of writing and reading. In fact, looking back in the recent archives of this blog, I see that as recently as 2020, every other piece seems to be a nature essay about such topics as the sky (“Up There and Down Here”), bugs (“With Respect to Insects”) and most of all, birds (“One Redstart”; “Four Crows”). My former zeal incrementally ebbed to reflect the changing nature of nature —my slower parkinsonian nature, that is. Let the other birds visit me like three of the crows did, let them perform acrobatics on a telephone pole, and let me settle for a familiar array of birdcalls and songs and opt for the winter cam of a Cornell Lab field in Ontario, presenting a virtual census of pine grosbeaks, crossbills, red-bellied woodpeckers, and black-capped chickadees. I could draw my own conclusions, the easier the better.

Or is it too easy to call such short cuts a bail-out from nature? Too soon to brand it an indictment of simplicity any more than it would be to put home on trial for being too available or too familiar. Listen to the writer, writer. Outside is not our only home. Inside can ensure shelter, safety, oneself, and society.  If “inside out” means a wrong-way inversion, why not try the reverse and bring the outside in? If not literally letting the raccoons have the run of the rec room, then at least mandate respect for outside rules, in honor of the home it  still is. “Too easy” could be a case of pure jealousy. Nature came first. Nature shows us how things work. Nature continues to follow its own rules, both stunningly complex and elegantly easy—especially if we can learn to leave it alone.

The Ober Legacy

Note: a recent (November) poem on the topic of Fathers

“The Ober legacy?”

my dad repeats.

It reminds me of his wry response

to a silly question I posed when I was about nine.

“That’s like asking,” he said, “‘If you were on a desert island,

what would you do for diversion?”

He could let the air out so elegantly .

We are in a bistro called Bar None 

where daydreamers separated by death can meet again.

I try a pun for legacy: “Of course, I know what’s more important is the leg you don’t see.’

I want an appreciative laugh but I’ll settle for a smile. Or anything

as long as it’s not “I don’t get it,”

Ah, a smile. Kind eyes. Encouraged, but still wary, I am like a vacuum cleaner salesman eager

to demonstrate how his latest model sucks. 

Too harsh, maybe?

The Legacy could be what the latest vacuum model is called.

I press on. Yes, the Ober Legacy. It’s what we have in common. As Obers. As dad and son

Start with words, wordplay, and fishing for compliments. Just for the halibut.

Also Puns and Anagrams crosswords in the Sunday New York Times.

And then there’s our legacy of diseases.

His, rheumatic fever and later heart failure. 

Mine, Parkinson’s, the leg I didn’t see that trips me up from time to time. 

Moving right along.

Cartoons: yours are droller;

and witty repartee,

letters, conversation, you all over;

poems, too small a sample, 

call it a draw.

And let’s not forget the Red Sox.

I’m talking about the leg you didn’t see, Dad:

I mean the miracle of 2004.

Our nemesis, the Yankees, needed one more win to advance to the Series. 

But the Sox denied them, then overtook them, and went on to blank the Cardinals 

four zip, and we did it! We won the whole thing, Dad! Champions of the world!

Maybe you  got wind of it somehow.

Or maybe that’s my job, telling you about it.

And now it’s your turn

to tell me about the legs

I didn’t see,

like the boat you rowed

as a floppy-haired teen

in Revere harbor—

the “Dam Phantom.”

You could start with that.

See What I Did There?

ANNOUNCER: “SEE WHAT I DID THERE?” presents “Who Writes This Crapola?”, a whodunit word play starring  DINO, DION, and ODIN.

NOID: [clears throat] And what am I, chopped liver?

ANNCR: Sorry! Also Introducing a special mystery guest: NOID!

DINO: Introducing? More like “bringing up the rear.” 

ODIN: Please! There are pleasant children.

NOID: I think you mean “children present.”

DINO: Or did you think “Bringing up the rear” meant “elevating the butt”?

ODIN: It doesn’t? No, I was merely pointing out the redundancy in your syntax.

DINO The whatsit in my whoozis?

ODIN: Don’t play dumb, Dino. It suits you. [Singing a la Dean Martin to the tune of “That’s Amore”] When two words mean the same, and they both share a claim, that’s redundant.  

NOID: [echoing] That’s superfluous!

ODIN:Wait. Dino, you did know that “Bringing up” and “rearing” have the same meaning, right?

DINO: Amigo, you are playing your syntax with a tin sax.  I was referring to a horse bringing up its front legs when it rears.

DION In other words, you rear the foal so she won’t fear the role. Right?

NOID: Exactly. Who said that? 

DION:  Rev. Spoonful? No ID.  

DINO: Speaking of misspeaking, you know what really irritates me? 

NOID: No ID! People who make you guess the answer to unknowable questions?

DINO: No, people who keep pronouncing my name wrong. It’s supposed to rhyme with vino, not rhino.

DION: Whoa! Hearing that would totally, like, suck. I mean, who could even stoop that low?

DINO: Right?

NOID: Hey! Whaddya call a rhino who drinks too much vino? 

DINO: A wino, obviously. 

ODIN: I got this! Try Sirah-tops! Oh, yeah. See what I did there? Sirah wine and Triceratops, the dino-rhino! [ODIN slaps five with himself] Who’s the god here? Who’s the god, baby? 

NOID: Actually, wrong. You call him horny

ODIN: What?That’s not even funny.

DINO: Like the fella said nine lines ago, my name’s Dino, as in Dean Martin, born Dino Crocetti in Stubenville, Ohio, 1917. And if you’re going to croon, at least get the words right [croons] ”When the moon hits your eye like a big pizza pie, that’s amore…

NOID: [nasal accent] Dean absolutely hated that song.

DINO: Hang on. Are you supposed to be—

NOID: Jerry Lewis? I get that a lot. Mostly I’m the Nerd, which Jerry, being a Newark kid,  would pronounce NOID.

ODIN: So the two of you make one PAIR O’ NOID! See what I did? “Make one paranoid?”  Oh, yes, Odin is in the building!

NOID: Not even funny.

DION: Wait, I know this guy.  He’s Fred Flintstone’s pet dinosaur, ODD ‘UN!

ODIN:Poltroon! Know you are in the presence of Odin, the most powerful of the Norse gods!

NOID: Never hoid of him.

DION: Yeh, must be in Norse Code.

ODIN: Feel my wrath, fools!

DINO: Chill, Uncle Bill. Today’s Thor’s day. According to  Magic & Mayhem, you’re powerless till next Wodinsday. 

ODIN: Frigga! You’re rightl

DION …And no help from your wife. Frigga’s day is on Friday.

DINO: Dion! We missed you, son! Where’ve you been wandering? 

DION: [singing part of “The Wanderer;] 

There’s Flo on my left and Mary on my right

And Janie is the girl I’ll be with tonight

And when she asks me which I love the best

I tear open my shirt I got Rosie on my chest

‘Cause I’m the wanderer yeah the wanderer

I roam around around around…

NOID: Someone might want to tell Dion about the Me Too Movement.

DION: Hey, you must be Noid.

NOID: You have no idea.

DION: Anyway, I’m totally paid up, man. Ever heard of Run-Around Sue?

ODIN: What runs around goes around. Like that game kids play in swimming pools. 

NOID: Marco—


DINO: Polo!

ODIN: Goood guess.. I was thinking of a different one:‘INDO…’

NOID: …European!?

.

ODIN: Really! You’re a-peein’ indo’? I woudn’t have guessed

DINO: Can’t believe you fell for that one, Floyd

NOID: I just read the script. Who writes this crapola anyway?

ODIN: It must be the Pun-isher. Doncha think?

DINO: Kinda has to be.

NOID:You mean the Announcer?

ODIN: Who else?He’s not getting any Balder So he must be the trickster,  Loki.  

ANNCR: I nod. Of course. The lowest key, dude. They don’t get any lower!

DINO:[crooning] Everybody loves somebody sometime…

DION: Everybody falls in love somehow!

DION: [The two singers somehow morph Dino’s song into the doo-wop  opening of Run-around Sue]

ANNCR. How do they do that? Well, anyway, check out our podcast for more episodes of Who Writes this Crapola?

This has been your announcer, Loki, rhymes with Karaoke,  aka the Trickster, aka the Punisher, aka the solution to the identity of who writes this crapola, wishing you a fond adieu. Bidding! We should definitely go with “bidding you a fond adieu.” Doncha think?

Three lime rickeys

1. Candle Limerick

A candle’s a weak sort of giimmer stick.
It makes a wee flame with a dimmer wick.
But a candle won’t fail ya
if its paraffinalia
ignites a bright light in your limerick!

2.   Limerick de l’amérique     

Girls bring home the gold in gymnastics!                                                                        
Smart babies eschew chewing plastics.
Oathbusters in hard hats
wipe high heels on bath mats, 
impeaching their speeches as “bumbastic.”

Guess what! I hired John Philip Sousa
to produce the whole lollapalooza!  
Quite a cap on my feather!
with ideal baseball weather
to a dog dreaming dreams about catching four-seamers on Italy’s isle, Lampedusa!            

3. Go jolly

Go jolly — a phrase I remember
like a souvenir leaf in November.
But what does it signify
and how does it dignify
the landscape of which it’s a member?

I guess I‘ll begin a new stanza
and try to come up with the anza.
Reliable Google
is proving too frugal,
distracting with clips from “Bonanza.”

“Go jolly” — it has a Zen sparsity.
Too modest to go out for varsity.
it builds a word palace
from the aurora borealis:
a feat of improbable artistry.

By golly, I’m grasping light rays
And losing my way in this phrase. 
Perhaps there’s a season
for both rhymes and reasons
when limericks have their field days!

                                                                                                                                                  

Demos and Monsters

 

Demos and monsters are joined at the hip Oak campus, where all students are expected to take part in demonstrations. They like to demonstrate “Demon’s Treat,” a blend of jest and devilry that’s celebrated twice—on April 1 and October 31. 

Actually, I made up “Demon’s Treat,” along with its  “trick-or-fool’s” dates of observance.  But what demos and monsters do have in common is the Latin root monstrare, which means “to show or demonstrate.”  A monster is a demonstration usually of darker significance, perhaps to show how unnatural nature can be, with a hint of monere, ‘to warn.” A demo and monster may even overlap. When some huckster offers a slick demo that isn’t on the level, there may be more than a little “beware!” about it. The monster’s flawed nature may even trump nature’s flaws! (See what I did there? “I did the mash—I did the monster mash!”!  I did the mash! It was a graveyard smash…”) I love that dirge.

This news reel is about different monsters, including the innocent, misunderstood, and demonstrably no good. The path starts at Spy Pond playground in Arlington, a frequent destination for my festinating footsteps (the “stutter-stepping” I sometimes lapse into, not monstrous, I hope. Recently, while biding my time in a bide-a-loo, I happened to hear a chant outside. It turned out to be from a daycare teacher who was taking roll-call for organizing fun & games with her kindergarteners. The chant went:  “Hickety-pickety bumblebee! Won’t you say your name for me?” Repeated over and over, name after name. Blake! Marisol! Peppy!

I don’t know how the little ones responded to the name-saying, assuming they played along. I was more focused on the daycare teacher who started the verse. I became obsessed with the upward inflection she drew out of “Won’t you say your name for MEEEE??  It reminded me of the madness in Poe’s “The Telltale Heart ”. There, it was the pallid eye of the old man that pushed his housemate over the edge. For me it was (or threatened to be) the agonizing cuteness of the likes of Barney the Dinosaur. But I was no lunatic, unless that label applies to a conflicted hanger-on to his own childhood mementoes. (This little piggy has all ten toes!) The buzzkill part of me refused to swear allegiance to the bumblebee, just as the childish part esteemed it. Esteem prevailed. Hickety-pickety, double-checked on Google, found a home in my notepad and in due course, here.

Behold! Food!

I knew in the heart of me that the daycare kids ate up this hickety-pickety tapioca with a spoon. After all, I had dispensed this same goo as a daycare teacher myself from British Columbia  to Massachusetts. I even admit to having been a monster-for-hire on more than a few playgrounds. More on that to follow. But first, let me roll out the old wanted poster to introduce a few other monsters that have lately crossed my path. One was a giant. Another was a fellow playground foe. A third was a hero. 

One was a giant? Is a giant a monster? Sometimes. By and (extra) large, they’re treated separately in wIcked-pedia and Go Ogle, my standard references for tallying evildoers. But why split hairs between the folktale giant in “Jack and the Beanstalk” and the accidents of nature, mad lab experiments, and children’s fears come to life, that are visited upon us as monsters. Most, but not all, storybook giants are monstrous. Many but not all monsters reach gigantic proportions. I’m not here to stir up any enmity, boys. I’m just trying to add some data for the wanted poster.  Good luck trying to identify Jack’s giant, by the way. Was it Blunderbore? Are you sure it wasn’t Thunderdell? Or Galligantus? How about Gogmagog? Some are two-headed; some are even three-headed. Frankly, I’m more interested in the chant the giant says–call it an early descendant of “hickety pickety bumblebee.” I’m referring to the infamous incantation that goes “Fee fie fo fum; I smell the blood of an Englishman.  Be he alive or be he dead, I’ll grind his bones to make my bread!” The English half of the chant is scary enough: smelling blood, making flour from ground bones. But for me the greater threat lay in those four faceless words, fee, fie, fo, fum. It was the fear of the undefined, approaching.

Undefined no more. I might have guessed that help would come from Charles MacKay, 19th c.  Scottish author of Extraordinary Popular Delusions and the Madness of Crowds. But it was another MacKay book, Gaelic Etymology of the Languages of  Western Europe, that told the giant’s tale. According to the popular Scot, fee fie, fo, fum and a fifth syllable, fa, conceal a  coded story of bad blood between Gaelics and Saxons. The syllables, McKay maintains, are short for five Gaelic words: faich, fiadh, fiu, fough, and feum; and those words stand for a sentence that a giant might indeed declaim upon discovering an English trespasser in his castle: In English, it translates as “Behold! Food!—good to eat—enough to satisfy my hunger!” 

Behold! Monsters, including giants, are essentially a human demo, filling a human need, be it to warn away Saxons or to fulfill the godlike fantasy of a Doctor Frankenstein. Most monsters probably aren’t aware that they are monsters. The gila monster of the American Southwest isn’t trying to live up or down to its name. It’s just a lizard trying to make a living (venomous? ¡vamonos!), targeting baby birds in particular. Impressing  humans is just a sideline, . As for Cookie Monster— Who need sideline ? Me got cookie! And if there’s no daylight between Cookie Monster and cookie-munching people, the same might be said about an unlikely monster called the Bird Whisperer.

Alicia and the Robins

This true story takes place in mid-July. As with Jack and the Beanstalk, the trouble started with a well-meaning  trespasser. And as is the case with gila monsters, it was a young bird that needed saving.—from a den of monsters known as OSIB-P—aka ”Our screened-in back porch.”

The young bird was a robin, half-grown, yellow-billed, and speckled with brown spots. With the help of a gaping hole in the wire mesh of Osib P, the adolescent thrush had found its way into an alien place, calling for coping skills it had not yet developed. Except for one: putting out a call for help in plaintive robinese. How likely that the call would be heard and answered? Likely enough that an adult robin, a female (and probably the Mom) flew over to the juvenile’s patch of screen and tried coaxing it to accept worms through holes in the mesh. The suggestion did not take. Nor could we rush the pace of evolving a higher intelligence to enable the kid to figure out that the entrance hole could double as an exit hole. But the call for help still had pull. Who should appear in our makeshift prison as a co-inmate, in a touching display of familial solidarity, but Mom herself! Would two heads prove smarter than one, allowing the penny to drop or the worm to turn? Alas, not even Mom, having just solved for in, could complete the equation for out. Meanwhile, the word had apparently spread through the yard about the porched-in pair. Robins were streaking by outside by the half-dozen, making a distressed racket I had never heard robins make before.

Now it is time to introduce the Bird Whisperer, with a practical but heroic musical theme arranged for oboe. Our houseguest, Alicia D., had arrived in town to perform (she’s a vocalist) over three nights.We explained the situation with the trapped robins. Mass Audubon had not responded to our calls. Bay State wanted too much money. Yet something about Alicia inspired confidence. I watched her move carefully toward the young robin. Listened to her talk to it softly in that same gentle coaxing tone adults have used to gain the trust of children and animals since the dawn of civilization. Crouching, soothing, wielding no alarming paraphernalia except for a pair of work gloves, somehow Alicia crossed a boundary with the robins, yielding neither to trust nor terror but letting in confusion, at least. And the result of that was a kind of frank magic. First the juvie submitted to the persuasion of the Bird Whisperer’s  glove, and then about ten minutes later, so did the adult.  I watched in amazement as the two robins, their yellow bills agape (with fear or uncertainty) submittied to being carried down to the backyard porch, where both promptly demonstrated their ability to fly. Maybe that’s when their gratitude and glory kicked in—proving their freedom to themselves.

Okay, so who’s the monster in this story? Not the birds; they’re the victims. Not Alicia; she saved the day. Could it be the story, the situation itself? Nah. Let’s go back to Alicia. Her status as the hero seems unchallenged, but did the birds buy in? All they knew was the crazy sensation of being scooped up by the Big Biped, the fee-fie foe, facing an unknown fate. Did the robins discern the grabber’s peaceful intentions? Doubtful. Until events suggested otherwise, the Bird Whisperer, or all of us big bipeds, were and are the monster!

Is that a problem or an opportunity? Both, I suppose. (Interesting to compare the rescue of the robins with my complicated attempts at saving the woodpecker and the dove [see “Golfing with Susi dog”]) So, yes, half-problem, half-opportunity. They usually pair up anyway. But the opportunity to be a monster—and to change what that state means—doesn’t often arise.

I can think of one example in literature: the character of Boo Radley in To Kill a Mockingbird. For most of the book, Boo was known as the neighboorhood weirdo: reclusive, creepy, stigmatized, and undergoing some form of post-traumatic stress disorder. Only at the very end, having been befriended by young Scout, did Boo have the chance to change from being the monster to the hero.

Being the Lava Monster

Few opportunities arose in my first attempts at being a monster-for-hire in another playground, far far away. Well, maybe one lesson did. I  was an aide-de-camp in a variety of after-school care programs. In no time, I recognized that my most compelling role with the kids was that of Monster, and not the obviously metaphoric kind. The growling, roaring, spinning and lifting kind, the more realistic the better.

Time wounds all heels, as we know, and time shortened the reign  of my Blunderbores and Galligantuses, as the kids put on weight and I conceded energy. There was a revival with the arrival of Matthew E. Ober, but my freelance career as monster was in its waning days I found writing for kids more to my liking than monstering. Also there was that one lesson I alluded to upstairs, which is neither pro- nor anti-monster. Practice kindness.

Which brings me back to Hickety-pickety Bumblebee and to the Lava Monster—the resident monster of the Spy Pond playground. I was drawn by the screams and the “Na na na boo boo” chants of you-can’t-catch-me. It was all so familiar, except for the replacement of one sacrificial adult with a rotating “It parade” of willing kids. And who was this lava monster anyway? It turned out to have a bunch of guises: a creature made of molten lava in the Disney film, Moana, set in Hawaii; at least a dozen so-named characters in fantasy video games; and the subject of a free-form park and playground game in which the players are pursued by the monster who has the ability to turn the floor or other surfaces into lava! Definitely a worthy heir to the nameless demos of danger that the chasers and the chased kept alive. It seemed a good opportunity for a poem to end this newsreel with, perhaps a poem called “Being the Lava Monster.”

Child’s play it may be 
but some say that 
“Ring Around the Rosie” 
is about The Black Death: 
with the telltale red rash,
the protective posies,
the sneezes (hash-oo! hash-oo!)
and all fall down.

Fact checkers say “Fake!”
There’s no plague round
this playground
But children know
it’s a scary place
full of daunting,
taunting.
and haunting. 

Already the youngest scream in terror
running from the Lava Monster.
Why do they provoke him so?
Don’t they know how infuriating it is 
to be jeered with“Na na-na boo boo!” over and over, 
like snapping a red cape at a bull, 
chanting, “Here, bully bully bully.”
Don’t fall for that bullcrap
You know what you’re meant to be: You’re It.

Good news!
They want you.
They need you 
to be the Lava Monster
pursued by a swarm of tormentors
pursuing their imaginations
My suggestion: Play along.
What’s the worst they can say to you?
“I’m rubber; you’re glue”?
Your comeback’s way worse.
In fact, it’s the ultimate curse:

“Oh, 
grow up.”         

Unfair to Middling 

Picture a picket line with one marcher carrying a sign: “UNFAIR TO MIDDLING!” 

Passers-by may ask, “Who’s this Middling guy, how is he being treated unfairly, and what am I supposed to do about it?”

Some might recognize in the sign the phrase “Fair to middling” and wonder: Is a pun afoot? Is a door a jar? Have these pedestrians gotten trapped in another one of my cockamaimie home newsreels? The Rooster crows in confirmation.

It may be unfair that fair has a much bigger following than middling. But “fair is fair”, after all, and so is “fair use.” Rest assured, the Sheriff is aware of this inequity, which is why this news path is devoted to middling, a word in need of a hug. 

Here are some definitions of middling I culled from a few on-line dictionaries: 1. medium, moderate, or average in size, quantity, or quality · 2. mediocre; ordinary; commonplace; pedestrian; lacking exceptional quality or ability. “the performance was middling at best”; mediocre, all right, indifferent, so-so (informal), unremarkable, tolerable, run-of-the-mill, passable, serviceable, unexceptional, half-pie (N.Z.)

It’s surely a form of madness to feel sorry for a word— especially if the pity is because of the meanings that word has accrued, such as “half-pie” (half-baked) from New Zealand. But I’m not feeling sorry for middling so much as I’m hoping to enlighten its users, current and potential, about the importance of being middling. 

Most of the time it’s used as an adjective,.  And thoughtful wordies agree that the main test of an adjective is how catchy it is (ad-ject meaning in Latin, “thrown to”). Mind you, not all things thrown are cleanly caught. Indeed, success often comes with a catch.

Ah, baseball metaphors. So prolific and generous, especially regarding human achievement. There’s fair, and failing fair, there’s foul. Moreover, sometimes the outcome is in doubt for a long suspenseful time, like Carlton Fisk’s willed-fair home run in Game 6 of the ‘75 World Series, its legitimacy assured by Fisk’s euphoric body language as he mind-melded the towering arc of the ball to clang into the Pesky Pole, which signified fair—not foul.  But as exhilarating and ubiquitous as  the decisive home run  is (don’t forget Mazeroski’s in 1960, Kirk Gibson’s in ‘88, Joe Carter’s in ‘93) doesn’t such guaranteed glory run counter to the half-assed, borrowed-luck, spirit of middling?   Well… Not  when you take into account Game 7, the game after Fisk’s magical homer for the Red Sox, the game the opposing team won, along with the Series.  

I’m just saying: It all balances out. And of course we revere the poetic justice of the hero’s vindication, so long as we leave room for the middle, the honest effort. even the  defeat snatched from the jaws of victory that may not palpitate the pulse, but has the power to surprise, to defy expectations set too low to begin with.

Does it really all balance out? Not the outcomes, maybe, not the scores.We’re not all fated to be feted, Or to be fetid either.  So what then?  Maybe just getting your at-bats.  Taking your hacks. Swinging for the downs.   Clobbering air. Having another at-bat. And this time, who knows?

That stirs one more baseball memory from third grade. The boys were up to bat. The girls were cheerleading. They were chanting, “Roy, Roy, he’s our man! If he can’t do it, Gary can! Gary, Gary, he’s our man! If he can’t do it, Hal can! Hal, Hal, he’s our man, If he can’t do it…”  I didn’t really like that chant. I didn’t like the pressure to succeed and on the other hand, I didn’t like how quickly the girls, whose  approval I coveted, gave up on us men as incapable. Well, actually, the only man I cared about was “Hal, Hal” If I couldn’t do it—whatever it was, hit a home run or drop a bunt—the cheering squad was ready to just move on to the next batter on deck. Nor did I derive any solidarity from all the other boys facing the same pressure. Their agony amounted to a mere stamp of my own. 

In a middling world, where you lower your expectations to the wide welcoming whatev, this third graders’ train wreck of success and failure might not ever happen. The middling way is not a matter of obeying rules but observing yourself. Follow your aspirations, kid, by all means, the loftier the better. Exude perspiration and inspiration where you find it. But expectations are not so clear-cut. There’s an overlap between the grant you take (the home run you didn’t expect), and what you take for granted. 

Wait. I got a better one. Can I just… Yeah? Thanks!  In other words—as I step off this path with a concluding wave—in other words, don’t let the hype get ahead of the hope. 

Not bad, eh? Can I call that the Middleman’s Maxim? And end with a little poem? Yeah? Thanks!

MiddlIng

Fair to middling’s
just a joke:
a trick of mirrors,
a puff of smoke.

It holds a riddle
inside a conundrum:
how wide is a middle?
What makes life turn humdrum?

Take middling’s measure
in pain or pleasure,
in safety or peril.
feral or tame,
The fee is the same.

If middling means
you don’t have as much stuff,
more or less—más o menos—
may be just enough.

And hunting abundance,
can lead to redundance.
If you’re missing Butch Cassidy,
ride on with Sundance.

Fair to middling
shrugs off improvement.
Yet even a snail’s pace
conducts a slow movement.

Seeking the most,
you risk losing the least.
Sufficiency
ensures a feast!

                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                            .                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                       

Paths and Doodles

Paths and Doodles

I’m a newshound— especially via the radio, a pursuit that begins most days with NPR’s Morning Edition at 7 am and is exhausted (as am I) between midnight and one, with “As It Happens,” a CBC interview show I remember fondly from my years living in Canada.This dependency on acquiring the latest news is sensitive to the Fear Of Missing Out (FOMO),lest the news change from hour to hour. It needs an independent source that will never run out, a source such as ourselves. We take for granted, ignore, or forget about our own news, which our brains keep compiling like an ever-filling reservoir. We need to revisit our private stories, our meaningful, customized news that we own but insufficiently acknowledge. 

So: what to call this personal info archive? Brain News? Too intellectual.The Monocle Chronicle? (Say what?) Then an aha. I bethought me of the old newsreels whose era I caught a parting glimpse of in the 1950s. They played before the movie feature and (most often) the Tom and Jerry (cat and mouse) cartoon. And that thought called to mind the company that produced a lot of those newsreels —Pathé— and its symbol, a crowing, wing-flapping rooster. Why a rooster? Dunno. Viaduck? Maybe because the world, and Europe in particular, was more rural in the Pathé brothers’ heyday. And the cock ruled the roost like an auctioneer.

Pathé and the maestro’s cock-a-doodle-doo led me to the soubriquet  Paths and Doodles, words that go well with the narratives and observations that make up much of the gnews gnawing my brain from minute to minute. To illustrate, here is a sample of some of my recent paths and doodles.

Path 1. This was not directly my news to claim, but collateral news counts.  Cue the tune.  “My wife’s in Iceland…Iceland…with her good friend Judy D… My wife’s in Iceland. (add twirly “Graceland” riff. OK, ditch the music). Iceland is kind of a bare place in my imagination, because I’m not—or wasn’t—there. And Iceland is usually a white blob on the map. I have been to Iceland once, in my 20s, when the cheapest student flight to Europe was on Icelandic Airways. I sat on the tarmac of Reykjavik airport for hours reading Catch-22. It is not a rich template to draw on. Moreover, what can you do with news that’s mainly secondhand? Just absorb the fact that Iceland has temporarily swallowed Carol and  balleen-squeeze what I can from her text messages: lava fields…gravel road a 2-hour drive to the lodge…poorly marked roundabouts…cafe overlooking the water…birds flitting and hovering. Not really my path, or maybe it is. I feel like I’ve misplaced Carol. (Where did she…? Oh, right. Iceland.) Here’s a short poem I found today called “Separation” by W.S.Merwin: 

Your absence has gone through me

like thread through a needle.

Everything I do is stitched with its color.

It’s also probable that there will be more of these travel separations to co-own in coming years.But it’s oke!

Path 2: Another newsworthy item I chanced upon was an interview with actor Alan Alda on The. New Yorker Radio Hour. For a while it ambled along like a typical celebrity piece. But what elevated it to the News path was the news (to me) that Alan Alda had been diagnosed with Parkinson’s Disease seven years ago. How had I missed that? It happened with Michael J. Fox, Linda Ronstadt, and Neil Diamond, among others: A member of the League of Eminent Exemplars unexpectedly joins the We Have Parkinson’s Too Movement. 

Alan Alda’s enrollment in the Parkinson’s Too Movement made me want to reexamine what I gained from both groups. From the celebritIes I  got a model of ideal how to be, even if it was imagined. Co-owning PD with Alda spoiled the ideal but made us brothers under the skin, which made me feel sorry for him, feel keen to welcome him to the club, and feel a little trespassed on by him, all at once. I felt like bucking him up while scrutinizing his credentials. When the interviewer asked him how he was doing, I felt a twinge of spite at his reply, thinking “Naturally you’re doing ‘surprisingly well’ and reaping the benefits of exercise; you’re Alan f-ing Alda.” Obviously, not all of these news items reflect well on me, which might reflect better on them as news items. Work those quads, Alda. You go, me.

This calls for a sidebar about my own recent PD misadventures. I might frame it by cautioning Hawkeye to be careful swallowing pills,citing a few instances lately of pills getting stuck in my gullet, after they stubbornly refused to take the waterslide to freedom, choosing instead the path of leashed resistance, even though it meant the acrid dissolving of the pill where it wasn’t meant to dissolve, and a nasty case of throat burn that came with it. These news paths entail lots of side trips in the weeds. Nevertheless I’ll risk a fraternal warning to Hawkeye: You will know them by their trappings:  micrographia (tiny handwriting), bradykinesia (the polar opposite of quarterback Tom Brady’s speed and agility); and constipulation, a burden with the density of a legal brief.

Too much information? No such thing, not when it’s  In the age of FOMO. I’ll close this newsreel with an item that could be a path if I gave it enough room, but probably doesn’t warrant more than a doodle. I am referring to a half hour of my life that I lost the other day to my growing  gallery of misspent guilty pleasures. It was a brief sampling of “Beach Party” on Turner Classic Movies, the first of the spring break beach blanket bikini bingo teensploitation films that led off the sixties with the help of borrowed joy from The Beach Boys, Jan and Dean, the Ventures and others who sold the sand, surf, and sex culture.”Beach Party” came out in 1963. I was 15, part of the target audience of yearning virgins, but El Paso, where I Iived, was far from the beach, whether Florida’s or LA’s. Of course I had a long-nurtured crush on Annette Funicello (we all did), dating back to the Disney days. I fantasized my chances with Annette were pretty good, considering the uninspiring smarm of my rival, Frankie Avalon, with whom she was always paired in those movies. Imagining Annette as my girlfriend was enough to fuel my dreams, let alone imagining her imagining me as her boyfriend. But what about “Beach Party”?  Seriously? Trying on the clothes you wore as a teenager is never a good idea.  Even Annette came close to silliness singing to her reflection in a mirror, a tune called “Treat Him Nicely” in which she berates herself for not being kinder to her movie boyfriend (Frankie, I assume). Nay, seek not guidance nor relevance in a beach bunny romp. Still, a kind of bent fun lives on in a representation of 1963, before the sixties figured out how to leave Ike and the Edsel , cope with JFK’s assassination, and make room for the Beatles, Stones, Janis, Jimi, Dylan, Woodstock, and all the rest. We did, somehow, maybe by first making room for Frankie and Annette.

I was equally fascinated by the group of “sophisticated” adults trying to steer a path of irony through the horniness of the kids. I recognized a few of them from their presence in other more familiar TV settings: Bob Cummings as a sex researcher, Morey Amsterdam as a chef sea captain, and Harvey Lembeck as an undangerous (except to himself) leather-clad biker named Eric Von Zipper. I didn’t see myself in “Beach Party” any more than I saw me in Iceland. But I did see an in-between age (‘63, teenage, mid-life)  trying to locate itself, fumblingly, yet gamely—and that I could relate to.                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                             

Absent with Leaves

Recently I had occasion to not attend my 50th class reunion among the granite battlements of Colgate U, where I gained valuable practice in writing fiction and cultivating lifelong friendships. I was sorry to miss out on hobnobbing with my fellow wizards—my physical powers were not up to the mythic challenge of The Hill— but at the behest of my old roommate Jim Smith, a.k.a. Logic Man, I wrote the following essay to reune for me in my absence

Absent with Leaves

I’m glad to report that I no longer have dreams in which my graduation is in doubt, owing to an unfulfilled obligation—final exam, essay, proof that I can swim. I settled the debt by solving a puzzle in another dream. The answer was, as usual, WHISK BROOM. But that would-be password was, of course, refused. Luckily there was an old stipulation, grandfathered in, that your grandfather could vouch for you. You just had to get his signature to the registrar by “the 50th adversary of your graduation.” This was not a typo! How was I supposed to know the identity of my fiftieth adversary? Dream luck rescued me again: it turned out that any adversary would work—Covid; Mr. Potter from It’s a Wonderful Life; a Russian oligarch with a made-up name—as long as your granddad signed. To help speed things along, I used my own aged appearance to convince the registrar that, as the old song goes, “I’m my own Grandpa!”

Would that all colleges nestled as comfortably as ours does between the realms of the factual and the fanciful. For example, who would have guessed the seminal role that leaves would play in my years at Colgate, with the cooperation of certain fellow believers. As freshmen dorm-mates Jim Smith and I recognized in the first weekend of October a modern myth worth keeping. That apotheosis of foliage and the sublime fed our souls way more than mere “leaf-peeping” could. It was a reward and a responsibility. For at least a decade following graduation, like acolytes maintaining a religious observance, we checked in with each other on each first weekend in October. Were we spending the time with due celebration? Were we according it the gravity (and levity) it deserved? It never occurred to us that we were overreaching, any more than that we were overreaching in the epic leaf-catching contests that climaxed in November, attended by a growing number of participants.

Leaf-racing and leaf-catching surely belong to all eras. While no cave drawings have come to light depicting early humans crouching beneath a tree whose leaves have broken into flight, then springing up to intercept the escapees before they hit the ground, it doesn’t prove there weren’t any wild leaf hunts. There had to have been ritual, coming-of-age, leaf-grabs in arboreal cultures to test the speed and agility of young rivals in pursuit of plump birds or one another.

We sophomores of the Colgate autumn leagues took to heart Dylan’s dogma that there’s no success like failure. And we had a lot of practice in the failure that’s no success at all. We chased the spinning whirligigs and the angular plane-slicers, committed ourselves to a slapstick slip-stack of attempted snatches that snared nothing, gambled on go-for-broke dives and non-paying, hubristic divinations. It called for the same athletic grace that would soon be devoted mainly to football and Frisbee. But this sport of ours had a deeply rooted appeal; it relied solely on human effort and the vagaries of nature–the dictates of wind and wing or subtler air currents, the fickle enthusiasms of gravity, resulting in long interminable waits where no leaf so much as stirred, and the even more mysterious, sudden migrations of leafage, unforced by any obvious command and giving rise to legends of mock heroes like Leaf Breezecheater or to theories on tree will.

There’s one more leaf to drop. We all know the power of second chances, enshrined in the idiom “turning over a new leaf.” Less familiar is the power of the leaf as a document. I’m thinking of the leaf that concludes “A Place From Which to View the World,” Howard Fineman’s great essay in our 50th class reunion book. Howie recounts finding an old maple leaf among the pages of Thoreau’s writings, a volume that carried memories of Joe Slater’s English Dept. That leaf signifies a meeting of a moment and a friendship. Or nature and sig-nature. Carefully inscribed in black ink on this unassuming folio are both our names, signed by Howard D. Fineman and Harold R. Ober. Too sparse to be called a time capsule, humble enough to fend off pretensions, it’s a useful leaf first.

So, even though limited mobility compels me to be a no-show this weekend, I will excuse my absence with an affidavit signed by my grandfather. In any case, don’t mark me AWOL, See me instead in a more inclusive context. Consider me AWL. Absent with leaves.